Solution Performance Over Promises
FranklinLacy.Com
Contains Proven Personal Results for USSR Demise (1984 - 1989), Welfare Reform (April 1995), Also Medicare/ Medicaid/Healthcare (In works April 9, 2001 - Present), Elderly Rights to life and tax saving/Terri Schiavo (August 27,2004), Social Security, Tort Reform, Sexual Predators (May 23, 2005), Illegal Imigrants (April 7, 2006), Suicide Bombers (April 22, 2007), Greenhouse Gases, Population, Education, Ethanol Hoax, Religion Compatibilities (January 4, 2008)
Medicare/ Medicaid/ Healthcare Elderly Rights to Life & Taxes Social Security, Tort Reform, Sexual Predators Population, Greenhse. Gasses, Education, & Religion |
I sued 22 lawyers and WON! These Solutions were sent to all governors, The President, and Congress. Click lower left picture edge once to start and twice to stop video. It loads while playing which could pause play. I sued a prestigious Southwest law firm for Legal Malpractice. They were 22 law partners and owners. I represented myself because other lawyers wouldn't touch it. They explained that if they took the case, then other law firms would reciprocally sue them for legal malpractice. It is a self-interest them-against-us reasoning designed to protect the members of their profession.
I don't tend to sue anyone, but these people deserved it. I justified 9 figures of damages plus triple RICO (Federal Racketeering) damages. It was 3 months before the end of discovery when they decided to settle. We were about to take depositions. They settled! I am not a lawyer. My degree is in physics. The lawsuit was filed at the Superior Court level. I was the Plaintiff. It was just me. I had no staff. The "Defendants' table" had the 22 legal partners and owners plus up to eight partners of the insurance company's law firm plus all the background law firm associates and staff.
This law firm is a Limited Liability Partnership, and they tried to exclude the individual partners and owners from being individually named because they alleged that they were protected under the LLP. If that were allowed to do this, then I would only have 3 direct contacts and the partnership company named on the lawsuit. This would be very bad because Limited Liability Partnerships tend to be shell companies with minimal assets. It could have been a hallow victory. I found loopholes, and the Limited Liability Partnership protection was denied. They were treated like a General Partnership for this lawsuit. I was told that means any judgment against them could be collected from all of them individually. They would be individually liable. I could collect on a judgment from any of them individually or in groups as I had the opportunity.
When I filed my legal briefs, I had to identify myself as "Plaintiff Pro Se". I understand that means that I am representing myself. It was a fun, easy experience. I feel that because I have a certain amount of reason and logic, that is all that is necessary. There are the common sense clearly written Rules of Civil Procedure, which must be followed. They don't have to be memorized. I just looked up the area that I was working on, such as interrogatories or production of documents or subpoenas. These rules are surprisingly brief and well written. The judge is out to see that a fair trial takes place, so he was very helpful to see that I wouldn't miss the few required deadlines for response. Each state's Rules of Civil Procedure are laid out much the same way with minor changes added on a state-by-state basis. For example I found that California's Rules of Civil Procedures looks similar to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which in turn looks familiar to California Family Court Rules of Civil Procedure.
I subtly gave the 22 sued lawyers the opportunity to think that they could get away with committing perjury on their declarations, and they allegedly proceeded to do so. Then I used evidence they did not know I had to prove their repeated alleged committed fraud on several instances. This allegedly fit right in with violation of the federal racketeering laws, and they therefore became liable for triple damages. When they realized that I could allegedly justify 9 figures for damages and triple RICO violation damages, they decided to settle rather than drag this out with judgments and appeals possibly lasting 15 years. I also let them know that I expected a 15-year litigation, so they could not count on my being anxious about the time it was taking. It was just a matter of dollars and cents and psychology. Lawyers and insurance companies like to think in terms of risk/reward, and I gave them plenty to think about. So they settled 3 months before discovery had ended.
Weighing it out, it was a good idea not to hire lawyers to represent me in this legal malpractice suit. What I would pay lawyers for this representation would come out of any settlement funds or judgment; therefore I would feel a lot of pressure to keep my legal costs down. This could provide less-than-desirable results. Why should I pay anyone a number of dollars to represent me in a legal malpractice case? It would cost me dearly for their fees. If I won I could only get back statutory legal fees (maybe less than 1%). Our system of judgment is set up so everyone pays for their own legal fees. I know lawyers like to say that if you represent yourself in court, you have a fool for a client. I totally disagree. If I did not represent myself in court, I fell that I WOULD BE A BIG FOOL. I ignored what lawyers told me as being self-serving advice. If I was a fool, what does that make this prestigious law firm?
I found that I could subscribe to LexusNexus.com or some other case law computer look up service for just the few months I needed them. I could pay them a little extra and got them to do my case law look ups on a personal basis. They became my research staff. Then I could just cut and paste directly into my briefs what they found and sent to my computer. It was truly easy. My total costs were around $15,000 primarily for copying a lot of production of documents that I requested from defendants.
All lawsuits are public record when they are filed. I could look up other suits and use them as a pattern of how the paperwork is to be structured. Also the briefs coming from the other side was a great training tool. I used scansoft.com's omnipage pro software to read in (scan) the defendants briefs in word processing format so that I could interject my arguments throughout in bold face and underlined thereby using defendants' input as an exhibit with immediate interjected arguments against what Defendants wrote. That was very effective because the judge had both sides' arguments and counter-arguments in one document. It was obviously a very effective approach.
Solving social problems is much like solving physical problems. I list all the parameters (considerations) and weight them in importance of impact on the problem. Then I come up with the best overall solution. It is easy for me.
I have been asked why I don't run for President. The answer is I don't have 100 million dollars. I have been married to my darling wife for 47 years, and we have one child (born in the back seat of our car) and one grand child. My age is 69 years, but my Mom and Dad lived for 89 and 91 years, respectively. I have a proven record of bringing solutions together and convincing sufficient numbers to support them. I am tenacious and tireless in this effort. After working up to 17 hours a day, 7 days a week, I have enough funds to live on the rest of my life from age 50. At that point I semi-retired, and I have been giving of myself by solving social problems.
My thoughts are to form a non-profit corporation so any money spent or collected toward the support of social solutions will be tax deductible. The money would be very efficiently utilized to support a candidate that will be best suited to solving this country's problems in the future whether it is Rudy Giuliani, John Edwards, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee or someone else. Where are the solutions these career politicians have contributed while in office? Promises alone are empty. Is it just one or two leadership accomplishments over the past 20 years or is it on-going? The Presidency isn't for people who have a lot of experience doing very little. I am not in office and have verifiably solved quite a few national and international problems and gotten both parties to implement them. Isn't that what true leadership of our government is all about?
|